From scratch to market

The rest of this site shows an engineer and a teacher. This page is the foundation under both, and the part a job title never quite captured: the business record. I have taken products from scratch to market more than once, for myself and for other people's companies, and what made me useful was never the code alone. It was having already absorbed the complexities that live between an idea and a paying customer.

Someone who watched me work the Coyote cloud program from another company said it better than I can:

"Chris not only did a fantastic job in translating deep technical concepts across department silos, but his true strength was being able to recognize where the business was and helping to build the bridge into the vision Coyote had heading into the cloud. You can't get to the future without getting everyone on the same page in seeing your vision, and Chris did exactly that. He made me a believer."Mark Tomcza, worked with me from a different company

That bridge, between where the business is and what engineering ships, is the job this page documents. It is also the job I'm looking for: call it a product owner who builds, or a principal engineer trusted with the product. What I'm looking for →


The record

Twenty-three years of products, mine and other people's.

2003

Management system for a music instrument distributorclient

Built it from scratch, wired into their third-party accounting, running their daily labor and process reporting

2006

ReSource, eCommerce and brand managementThe Shamrock Companies

Created it: commerce modules on DotNetNuke, alongside BizTalk messaging between five order-entry systems and the ERP

2010

Requirements to Code Mappermine

My first public product, published on CodePlex. It broke when anyone refactored, and I spent sixteen years coming back to that. The write-up →

2013 to 2018

Point-of-sale delivery platforma sporting-goods retailer, via Polaris

Designed the multi-channel deployment system for 10,000+ locations and 80,000+ nodes, and ran the 23-person development and QA org as interim manager for 18 months

2018

A cryptocurrency exchange's launchclient

The infrastructure. The product did $22M in its first 48 hours, and the launch held

2019 to 2023

Coyote Sandbox, ephemeral test environmentsCoyote Logistics

A four-year skunkworks I kept alive until it was greenlit to redefine how the whole org built software

2024 to 2025

A TMS serving nine customers, and its successorNext Generation Logistics

Inherited it undocumented after its only developer passed away. Stabilized the business, built a team, then built the replacement on Power Platform

2025 →

Socket Merlin, AI support orchestrationMetafora's Socket product line

Primary engineer, with LangFuse tracing and a production evaluation pipeline behind every agent run

2026

Runnin' Mules!mine

All of it: game, servers, dashboards, rate limits, tutorial. Live on Cloud Run


The jobs a product actually contains

"Product owner" is a bundle of unglamorous responsibilities, and I have held each of them somewhere specific:


The complexities nobody puts on the diagram

Each of these cost something to learn, on a specific product:

  1. The hardest dependency is a decision, not a technology. Coyote Sandbox was buildable years before it was greenlit. Keeping a product alive through four years of "not yet" was the actual work.
  2. Inherited products arrive with customers attached and no map. Nine businesses were running on the Next Generation Logistics codebase the day I first saw it. You stabilize revenue first and refactor second.
  3. A launch has to survive its own success. $22M in 48 hours is only a good story because the infrastructure held.
  4. "Is it done?" has three different answers, and the engineer, the product owner, and QA are each right. Helix exists because averaging them misleads all three.
  5. Adoption is the product. The Wall Street Journal piece and the GitHub keynote were never about a tool. They were about several hundred people agreeing to work differently, which is a business change wearing an engineering costume.

Strategic and tactical are the same job done properly

The person who managed me for years wrote the spectrum claim I would most want a recommendation to make:

"Many of his strengths align as a strategic thought leader, but Chris is one of those rare individuals who is also a tactical leader. For Chris, the work isn't complete until he has implemented it."Marc Griseta, Scrum Master for Northern Trust (managed me directly)

That is what covering the whole spectrum means here: I can sit in the roadmap conversation and in the pull request on the same day, and I have run every seat in between, including the ones with budgets, vendors, and customers attached.

Related What I'm looking for · Teaching · Building with AI · Projects · Experience